October 21, 2021
“Congressional Democrats face many hard choices as they seek to fit an ambitious agenda of social spending on child care, college education and health care into a reconciliation bill with a maximum cost of roughly $2 trillion over 10 years. It is clear, however, that the proposed programs are simply too pricey if lawmakers want to make them permanent and available to all.
Policymakers can reduce costs by targeting subsidies to those most in need or by requiring some form of income-related contribution. A sustainable and responsible fiscal policy requires hard choices, not the addition of free benefits for all.”
Read the full article here.
Last updated: February 6, 2023 |
The Hill
via Robert Bixby
Continue Reading
Related Content

News
Matter of Fact with Soledad O’Brien: How to Address America’s Massive Federal Debt
News
The Hill Op-Ed: The Economy Is Cooling But The US is a Frog in Hot Water
News
The Hill Op-Ed: An Effective Fiscal Commission Must Put Taxes and Entitlements on the Table
News
Op-Ed by Concord Coalition Board Member Dr. Carolyn Bourdeaux: Federal Budget Lessons from the States
News
Op-Ed in The Hill by The Concord Coalition’s Steve Robinson: There’s a Debt Limit Escape Clause That Doesn’t Include the 14th Amendment
News
Debt Ceiling War Raises Angst Among Floridians – Featuring The Concord Coalition’s Steve Robinson
News
Op-Ed by Bob Bixby in The Hill: Biden’s budget includes $3 trillion in deficit reduction. It’s still not enough
News
NPR Coverage of President Biden Releasing His FY 2024 Budget – Interview with Bob Bixby
News
The Federal Debt: A Problem With No Easy Answers – America Trends Podcast
News
Obscure Law Contains Debt Limit Escape Hatch for Social Security
News
The Hill Op-Ed: The CBO is Pulling No Punches on the Dire Deficit Outlook
News
Don’t Let Partisan Gridlock Stall Government Functions