December 7, 2010
Some people on both ends of the political spectrum have criticized the recommendations of the President’s fiscal commission as well as other bipartisan deficit-reduction plans such as the one recently unveiled by the Bipartisan Policy Center’s Debt Reduction Task Force. Some of these critics favor other plans.
“With all the screaming coming from both extremes, you’d think the competing visions out there must be so vastly different that there couldn’t possibly be such a thing as a truly ‘bipartisan’ way to reduce the deficit,” says Diane Lim Rogers, The Concord Coalition’s chief economist.
But in a blog posting Monday, Rogers points to some “rough” similarities between a number of the competing plans. These include domestic and defense spending cuts, progressive changes in Social Security and Medicare, capping tax preferences such as itemized deductions, and more effective short-term measures to stimulate the economy.
External links:
Bipartisan Policy Center Debt Reduction Task Force
Last updated: May 11, 2021
Continue Reading
Related Content
News
When Debt Outruns the Economy: Time for (at least) a 3% Deficit Target
News
Return to Fiscal Sanity: Bring Back the “Conrad Rule”
News
Why a Federal Gas Tax Holiday Misses the Real Highway Funding Problem
News
Can Taxes on the Ultra‑Wealthy Help Solve America’s Debt Problem?
News
When Bigger Budgets Meet Broken Books: The Pentagon’s Audit Failures and the Push for a $446 Billion Increase
News
Two Little‑Known Features of Social Security That Drive Its Long‑Term Costs
News
The Wrong Direction: How Recent Policy Changes Have Worsened Social Security’s Long‑Term Fiscal Outlook
News
Understanding Social Security: It’s Not Just “Get What You Pay In”
News
Why Cutting Waste, Fraud, and Abuse Isn’t Enough to Balance the Budget: Lessons from DOGE
News
Why Cutting IRS Funding Costs Far More Than It Saves
News
Elevate America with a Next‑Generation Balanced Budget Amendment
News
Congress Needs to Make a Plan Now to Cut the Debt